Title
Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
6-30-2012
SSRN Discipline
Legal Scholarship Network; Rhetoric & Communication Research Network; Law & Society eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Humanities Network; Political Science Network; RCRN Subject Matter eJournals
Abstract
This article reviews examples of scornful contemptuous belittling or sarcastic language by judges addressing litigants who are poor marginalized or seeking to redress unfamiliar injuries Often courts employ language of this sort when dismissing cases that strike them as offthewall or when imposing Rule 11 sanctions for claims that seem to them frivolous The authors develop a theory to understand and limit sarcasm and satire to situations that genuinely call for them
Recommended Citation
Jean Stefancic & Richard Delgado,
Scorn,
(2012).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_working_papers/49