Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
3-8-2018
SSRN Discipline
BioRN Subject Matter eJournals; Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals; Biology Research Network; Legal Scholarship Network; PRN Subject Matter eJournals; Criminal Law & Procedure eJournals; Philosophy Research Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; CSN Subject Matter eJournals; Cognitive Science Network; Humanities Network; Law, Brain & Behavior eJournals
Abstract
This chapter discusses recent studies on fMRIbased lie detection In Minds Brains and Law Dennis Patterson and I examined the scholarly literature and judicial opinions on the topic and we discussed several empirical and conceptual issues affecting the use of such evidence in legal settings In this chapter I focus on two conceptual issues and examine several studies that have been published since the publication of our book The conceptual issues concern 1 the distinction between deception and lying and 2 the concept of lying itself or the criteria for what constitutes a lie As with the array of studies that we examined previously the morerecent studies also face serious limitations because of these issues
Recommended Citation
Michael S. Pardo,
Lying, Deception, and fMRI: A Critical Update,
(2018).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_working_papers/306