Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

4-11-2011

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution eJournals; Law & Society eJournals; Law & Society: Private Law eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Public Law & Legal Theory; Humanities Network; Political Science Network; Employment, Labor, Compensation & Pension Law eJournals

Abstract

The class action device is essential to a wellfunctioning system of justice because of its ability to balance the values of access to the courts and efficient adjudication of disputes This was the vision of the drafters of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 This Court can and should interpret Rule 23s text in a way that vindicates these overarching goalsParticularly in an adjudicative class action the certification motion needs to be understood as a preliminary step that is complimented by motions to dismiss and summary judgment motions The aim of class certification is not to screen out suits that fail even to allege a claim for relief that is for motions to dismiss nor to issue dispositive rulings on the merits that is the purpose of summary judgment or trial Instead it is to determine whether the purposes of the class action rule would be served by proceeding with a collective litigationThe district court case did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the proposed class met the requirements of Rule 23a In fact the court's attention to the detailed pleadings and the extensive evidence gathered by the parties in assessing whether the named plaintiffs' claims shared common questions of law or fact with claims of absent class members showed a level of rigorous evaluation that went beyond the 23a threshold Classification of the class under 23b2 was also appropriate under the Federal Rules Petitioner's contrary arguments ignore the text purpose and history of Rule 23

Download

Share

COinS