Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

1-28-2011

SSRN Discipline

Economics Research Network; Legal Scholarship Network; Public Choice & Political Economy eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Corporate Governance Network; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; SRPN Subject Matter eJournals; ERN Subject Matter eJournals; Information Systems & eBusiness Network; Sustainability Research & Policy Network; Environmental & Natural Resources Law eJournals

Abstract

Momentum for Chesapeake Bay restoration has advanced significantly in the past two years shaped by the combination of President Obama's Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration Executive Order and the EPA's Baywide Total Maximum Daily Load TMDL process These federal initiatives taken in partnership with the Bay states required the Bay states and the District of Columbia to submit Watershed Implementation Plans WIPs to demonstrate how they will meet the pollution targets in the applicable TMDLsIn August the Center for Progressive Reform sent the Chesapeake Bay watershed jurisdictions Delaware Maryland New York Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia and the District of Columbia metrics by which our panel of water quality experts would judge the strength of the plans we also submitted comments to the states in November on their draft plans The states' final plans were submitted to EPA in November and DecemberThe state plans fail to provide a specific roadmap for restoring the Bay CPR says today in Missing the Mark in the Chesapeake Bay A Report Card for the Phase I Watershed Implementation Plans press release The report was written by CPR Member Scholars William Andreen Robert Glicksman and Rena Steinzor and CPR executive director Shana Jones and policy analyst Yee HuangOur report found that the state plans all underperformed to varying degrees on the two primary areas for evaluation transparency of information and strength of program design While improvements from the drafts the final plans were light on providing specific commitments for actions needed to achieve the required pollution reductions and generally did not pledge dedicated funding for the proposed programs The plans generally did not establish a baseline for existing programs' effectiveness to allow the public to monitor future performance in implementing the pollution reduction controls

Download

Share

COinS