Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

2-21-2019

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; Criminal Law & Procedure eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution eJournals; Law & Society eJournals; Legal Anthropology eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; AARN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals; Law, Brain & Behavior eJournals; Political Science Network; Anthropology & Archaeology Research Network

Abstract

This rejoinder replies to twenty commentaries on our article Relative Plausibility and Its Critics available at a hrefhttpsssrncomabstract3179601httpsssrncomabstract3179601abrbr Our response has four objectives brbr1 presenting further details regarding relative plausibility and the scope of our project in order to address some of our critics claims of ambiguity brbr2 examining some important methodological considerations brbr3 clarifying the significance of the conjunction problem and its role in the probability debates and brbr4 noting avenues for future research

Download

Share

COinS