Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

5-19-2005

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; Criminal Law & Procedure eJournals; Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Public Law & Legal Theory

Abstract

This Article aims to expand the debate over the proper standard of review that applies in state prisoner habeas corpus actions in federal court To date this debate has centered on whether federal habeas courts should defer to the state courts resolution of federal legal questions or whether federal habeas courts should assess and apply federal law de novo However in Williams v Taylor 529 US 362 2000 the Supreme Court held that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act AEDPA imposes a deferential standard of review that precludes a federal habeas court from granting relief based simply on its independent assessment of federal law Under AEDPA federal habeas courts must defer to a state courts rejection of a petitioners constitutional claim unless the state courts decision is either contrary to or involves an unreasonable application of established federal law The key question therefore is no longer whether deference is required but how that deferential standard should operateA threshold question in applying the new standard is whether it targets the legal reasoning underlying the state courts ruling or whether it looks solely at the result reached by the state court regardless of how analytically the state court came to that result The thesis of this article is that AEDPAs deferential standard should scrutinize the legal opinion issued by the state court and therefore AEDPA should bar relief only where that opinion correctly identifies the governing rule of federal law and reasonably applies that rule Although this approach would not guarantee independent relitigation of federal claims on federal habeas it would ensure that petitioners receive one analytically sound adjudication of their federal claims It would also create a tangible incentive for state courts to adjudicate federal law claims thoroughly and explicitly which in the long run could enhance overall enforcement of federal rights

Download

Share

COinS