Title
Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
4-16-2020
SSRN Discipline
Legal Scholarship Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Litigation, Procedure & Dispute Resolution eJournals; Law & Society eJournals; Law & Society: Public Law eJournals; Legal Anthropology eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; AARN Subject Matter eJournals; Political Science Network; Anthropology & Archaeology Research Network
Abstract
According to the conventional wisdom the Supreme Courts 2009 decision in Ashcroft v Iqbal discarded notice pleading in favor of plausibility pleading This Article "” part of a symposium commemorating the Iqbal decisions tenth anniversary "” highlights decisions during those ten years that have continued to endorse notice pleading despite Iqbal It also argues that those decisions reflect the best way to read the Iqbal decision Although Iqbal is a troubling decision in many respects it can be implemented consistently with the noticepleading framework that the original drafters of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure had in mind
Recommended Citation
Adam Steinman,
Notice Pleading in Exile,
(2020).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_working_papers/702