Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

5-3-2018

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; Criminal Law & Procedure eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Law & Society eJournals; Law & Society: Public Law eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals

Abstract

Various arguments have been made to explain why public defenders continue to handle excessive caseloads a lack of independence organizational culture or ethical blindness among them All of these arguments are based on the idea that a public defender elects to labor under an excessive caseload either because they do not see it as excessive or because they realize it is but believe a refusal will lead to adverse consequences for themselves In this essay I argue that the decision to maintain an excessive caseload may not always be attributable to selfinterest on the part of the public defender but can be motivated by a concern for the welfare of prospective clients The possibility that case refusal will result in prospective clients receiving no representation the poor quality of alternative counsel and the lack of any meaningful remedy for defendants who are denied representation creates a situation where representation by a public defender with an excessive caseload can be seen as the defendant's best option

Download

Share

COinS