Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

9-30-2011

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; Social Insurance Research Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Law & Society eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Public Law & Legal Theory; Political Science Network

Abstract

The Supreme Court's Article III standing doctrine has plagued liberal groups for nearly forty years Recently however the doctrine has blocked a number of conservative lawsuits opposing gay marriage the 2010 health care law and the expansion of federal funding for stemcell research What can we learn from these cases Because contemporary criticisms of standing doctrine have usually come from the left and defenses from the right it is commonplace to associate arguments for broad standing with leftwing political agendas But as some scholars have shown older versions of standing doctrine served liberal purposes in the New Deal and its immediate aftermath The current strict standing doctrine now keeping conservative activists out of federal court may have returned to its roots But if one truly believes that the federal courts should be open to more plaintiffs one should instead see that these cases present a strangebedfellows moment that might persuade a majority of the Court to alter existing standing doctrine Liberal members of the Court generally advocate for a more expansive doctrine of standing conservative members of the Court usually support restrictive standing doctrine but their interest in reaching the merits of certain cases may lead them to agree to certain reforms In this Article I address that prospect as well as the possibility that Congress might enact legislation to force the standing question If the Court seizes the opportunity to reform standing doctrine what are its options Will changes to the doctrine affect all plaintiffs Or are these recent examples of conservative impact litigation different in kind from the cases that generated current standing doctrine In answering these questions I review recent suggestions for amending the doctrine In the end I conclude these new conservative cases are lamentably unlikely to lead to much change in the law of standing

Download

Share

COinS