Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

4-18-2012

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Network; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Innovation Disciplines eJournals; ERPN Subject Matter eJournals; IRPN Subject Matter eJournals; Intellectual Property Law eJournals; Innovation Research & Policy Network

Abstract

Fractals are geometric objects of inexhaustible detail Fractal structures have been found in the contours of mountain ranges the patterns of veins on a leaf and the fluctuations of the Dow Jones Industrial Average The endeavor of inventing new technologies consisting of a hierarchical network of practical inquiries exhibits fractal properties as well Among these are multiplicity latency and selfsimilarity Multiplicity means that a single inventive idea may lead to an immense and diverse array of technological artifacts Latency means that the potential of an inventive idea to yield practical embodiments only reveals itself in time and may never be fully known Selfsimilarity means that invention is not scaledependent in other words breakthroughs and refinements may be difficult in principle to distinguish Invention as a whole resembles an everexpanding fractal island of promontory upon promontory Patent law assigns a particular inventor legal rights to a portion of that intricate coastline The fractal properties of multiplicity latency and selfsimilarity contribute to many of the perennial difficulties in patent law including fixing the meaning of claim language properly applying the enablement and written description requirements and identifying "abstract ideas" that cannot be patented Understanding the fractal properties of invention is an important step in addressing these issues

Download

Share

COinS