Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

11-10-2015

SSRN Discipline

Legal Scholarship Network; PRN Subject Matter eJournals; Philosophy Research Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Law & Society eJournals; Law & Society: Public Law eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals; Humanities Network; Political Science Network

Abstract

This essay revisits Yale history professor Allen Johnson's article "The Constitutionality of the Fugitive Slave Acts" which appeared in the Yale Law Journal in December 1921 Johnson wrote about a law that had been nullified by the Civil War and the Thirteenth Amendment nearly 70 years before His article was part of the scholarly reconsideration of the origins of Civil War designed to reconcile North and South Northerners especially Northern scholars blamed the Civil War on fanatics on both sides and in some ways exculpated Southerners for their role in the War While scholars of memory have explored the rewriting of history in the early twentieth century no one has noticed how it stretched outside of history books and into the pages of the distinguished Yale Law Journal The efforts to rewrite constitutional history and to defend the south's case for one of the most reviled acts in American history reached into territory and to scholars we had not previously known This essay thus implicates a wider stretch of legal and historical writing than we had known in the efforts to defend the proslavery south

Download

Share

COinS