Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
11-10-2012
SSRN Discipline
Legal Scholarship Network; PRN Subject Matter eJournals; Philosophy Research Network; Social Insurance Research Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Law & Society eJournals; Law & Society: Public Law eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals; Humanities Network; Political Science Network; Anthropology & Archaeology Research Network
Abstract
This short paper is a response to Steven Smith's argument for an institutional understanding of the Establishment Clause It challenges Smith's dismissive posture toward the classical understanding of the "secular" The classical understanding takes secular to refer "to this time and this world as opposed to some other time or world such as "˜eternity' or the hereafter" rather than simply denoting a "nonreligious" viewpoint By focusing on three presuppositions underlying the classical account "” 1 the kingship of God 2 the presence of the church and 3 the expectation of a worldtocome "” the paper argues that the classical account provides a more robust limitation on government than is commonly assumed
Recommended Citation
William S. Brewbaker III,
Government for the Time Being,
(2012).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_working_papers/360