Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

3-11-2015

SSRN Discipline

PSN Subject Matter eJournals; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals; CJRN Subject Matter eJournals; Political Behavior eJournals; Legal Scholarship Network; PRN Subject Matter eJournals; Criminal Law & Procedure eJournals; Philosophy Research Network; Social Insurance Research Network; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; CSN Subject Matter eJournals; Criminal Justice Research Network; Cognitive Science Network; Humanities Network; Law, Brain & Behavior eJournals; Political Science Network

Abstract

This essay forthcoming in a symposium issue of Jurisprudence replies to reviews of our book Minds Brains and Law The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience Oxford University Press 2013 by Stephen Morse Teneille Brown and David Faigman Morse and Brown are largely in agreement with many aspects of our arguments But they each raise challenges with respect to some of the details We first discuss the extensions amendments and objections they each have raised Faigman takes a more critical stance Accordingly we devote the bulk of our reply to correcting several misunderstanding and misinterpretations that underlie his critique

Download

Share

COinS