Document Type

Working Paper

Publication Date

9-12-2003

SSRN Discipline

PSN Subject Matter eJournals; *Humanities - Forthcoming Areas; Religious Studies Research Network; LSN Subject Matter eJournals; Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournals; Political Behavior eJournals; Legal Scholarship Network; PRN Subject Matter eJournals; Rhetoric & Communication Research Network; Criminal Law & Procedure eJournals; Philosophy Research Network; Womens & Gender Studies Research Network; Conflict Studies eJournals; Law School Research Papers - Legal Studies; Law School Research Papers - Public Law & Legal Theory; Humanities Network; Political Science Network; RCRN Subject Matter eJournals

Abstract

How did Americans apportion responsibility for the acts of September 11 and how might that response change in the aftermath of future terrorism This article studies the nations reaction through a sociological lens Following highprofile crimes the public often panics targeting marginal subcommunities with anger and new regulations This phenomenon is often termed moral panic After technological catastrophes however public blame is typically more diffuse taking the form of risk society panics that focus not only on individuals and subcommunities but also socially powerful institutions such as corporations and the government September 11 was a combination of crime and technological catastrophe criminals killed thousands of people by subverting technology taking advantage of the dangers inherent to air travel high rise buildings and the like Public reaction reflected this ambiguityThis article studies rhetoric used after September 11 to understand why public anxiety unfolded as it did Despite anger towards Muslims and people from the Middle East and government policy disparately targeting these groups public and institutional responses were mild compared to internment policies following Pearl Harbor A new rhetoric has surfaced however linking terrorism Islam and pedophilia By connecting these concepts moral entrepreneurs lay the groundwork for a very different response to new terrorism In the aftermath of an incident similar to September 11 Muslims could be the object of a moral panic targeted for radical regulation such as internment By framing Muslims as the equivalent of pedophiles advocates may attempt to argue for such policies as the moral equivalent of sexual offender civil commitment This article suggests that civil rights advocates develop counternarratives to address any such developments

Download

Share

COinS