Publication Date
1993
Abstract
This article reviews examples of scornful contemptuous belittling or sarcastic language by judges addressing litigants who are poor marginalized or seeking to redress unfamiliar injuries Often courts employ language of this sort when dismissing cases that strike them as offthewall or when imposing Rule 11 sanctions for claims that seem to them frivolous The authors develop a theory to understand and limit sarcasm and satire to situations that genuinely call for them
Recommended Citation
Richard Delgado & Jean Stefancic,
Scorn,
35
Wm. & Mary L. Rev.
1061
(1993).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles/566
COinS