This Article argues that mass torts involving multiple tortfeasors can be welfare enhancing It begins by investigating the role of "dilution of liability" "” a phenomenon that has been condemned for its role in facilitating accidents According to the literature in alternative care situations where the damage to the victim is constant dilution of liability leads to inefficient precaution levels and consequently to more bad accidents The Article deviates from this literature and shows that dilution of liability can be welfare enhancing This is so even in the quintessential case where dilution of liability has been denounced The Article further shows that an activity that is socially undesirable and should give rise to liability can become desirable as the number of tortfeasors increases Put differently it shows that in some situations an activity that would and should be condemned if conducted by one tortfeasor may become socially desirable if done by many The Article analyzes the conditions under which such desirable "tortfests" occur and it has important implications to the salience literature After investigating the impact of tortfests on actors' precaution and activity levels the Article examines mechanisms that would incentivize actors in certain situations to join a group wrongdoing or combine with others to initiate one The result it is argued could increase societal welfare
J. S. Dillbary,
U. Chi. L. Rev.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/fac_articles/84